A maintained securities context.
Companies, filings, financial periods, statements, notes, entities, and exhibits are structured into a continuously updated research system.
General-purpose models understand language. They were not built with a continuously maintained understanding of the public-company record.
Useful analysis requires more than access to a document. The system must identify the right issuer, form, period, statement, table, disclosure, relationship, and source passage—then determine whether the evidence supports the conclusion.
Companies, filings, financial periods, statements, notes, entities, and exhibits are structured into a continuously updated research system.
The research process begins by assembling the authoritative evidence required for the question rather than relying on broad model memory.
A conclusion receives verified status only when the retrieved record supports it under the system’s review criteria.
FinanceBench tests open-book financial question answering against source documents and supporting evidence. Vekstar’s evaluation framework focuses on retrieval, calculations, cross-document reasoning, source support, and abstention.
Prototype result supplied for this website concept. Publish only with a complete, reproducible methodology and answer-level results.
The original FinanceBench paper reported that the evaluated GPT-4 Turbo retrieval setup answered correctly on 19% of the tested questions.
State which filings, versions, tables, and supporting documents were available to the system.
Disclose models, retrieval, prompts, tools, calculation methods, and verification thresholds.
Release answer-level outcomes, failure categories, abstentions, and known limitations.
| Report | Scope | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| VEKSTAR-01 System Card | Architecture, source controls, verification, limitations, and deployment. | Draft | Publish PDF |
| FinanceBench Evaluation | Reproducible benchmark methodology and answer-level results. | Required before claim | Publish methodology |
| SEC Corpus Coverage | Document counts, issuer coverage, form coverage, latency, and exceptions. | In validation | Publish data sheet |
| Verification Gate | Support criteria, contradiction handling, confidence, and abstention. | In development | Publish technical note |
The goal is not to make AI sound certain. It is to make every conclusion inspectable.Explore a live workflow
We will configure your demonstration around the companies, filing types, peer sets, and highest-cost research workflows your team already covers.